Several scientific literatures bear on components of the structural model of life: nonequilibrium thermodynamics, origins-of-life research, and evolutionary theory. They do not independently establish one agreed definition of life, nor do they converge on a single empirically confirmed way from dissipation to cognition. They provide evidence about the conditions under which organized, self-maintaining, and evolving systems can arise. The book's closure-plus-throughput identification is a philosophical synthesis of that literature, not a result thermodynamics or evolutionary theory establishes on its own. Predictive processing is treated separately at [§8.1.2](<8.1.2 What is Required.md>).

*Thermodynamics.* A living system is a dissipative structure: a configuration that maintains low internal entropy by absorbing lower-entropy inputs and exporting higher-entropy outputs. Schrödinger -(Schrödinger, E., 1944) first sharpened the question, asking how life maintains order against the second law's drift toward equilibrium. Nicolis and Prigogine -(Prigogine, I., and G. Nicolis, 1977) answered part of it by formalizing how systems driven far from equilibrium self-organize into intricate cycles that dissipate gradients more thoroughly than static configurations do. The fluctuation theorems of Jarzynski -(Jarzynski, C., 1997) and Crooks -(Crooks, G. E., 1999) supply the formal nonequilibrium-thermodynamics foundations for treating self-replication as thermodynamically favored under sustained gradients; England -(England, J. L., 2013) offers one specific articulation, deriving thermodynamic lower bounds on entropy production during self-replication consistent with the broader fluctuation-theorem framework. The second law of thermodynamics supplies the constraint under which such structures exist. Life is the class of configurations that have evolved to persist under that constraint by channeling energy through metabolic cycles rather than relaxing to equilibrium.

Thermodynamics supplies constraints and models relevant to the structural identification [§7.8](<7.8 Life.md>) advances: self-replication and self-maintenance require sustained free-energy throughput and entropy export. Whether such configurations are generally favored outcomes, how likely they are to originate, and whether they are attractors under realistic prebiotic conditions remain open questions. The framework's modal claims are distinct from these empirical matters. At most, thermodynamics shows that the structural picture is compatible with the behavior of dissipative systems under some specified conditions.

*Chemoautotrophic origin.* The first life, if it arose without earlier biology, required non-biological sources of usable free energy. Alkaline hydrothermal vents are a major and productive hypothesis: Martin and Russell -(Martin, W., and M. J. Russell, 2007), Lane -(Lane, N., 2015), Lane and Martin -(Lane, N., and W. F. Martin, 2012), Sojo et al. -(Sojo, V., B. Herschy, A. Whicher, E. Camprubí, and N. Lane, 2016), and Weiss et al. -(Weiss, M. C., F. L. Sousa, N. Mrnjavac, S. Neukirchen, M. Roettger, S. Nelson-Sathi, and W. F. Martin, 2016) develop arguments concerning natural proton gradients, geochemical disequilibrium, and reconstructions of LUCA. These sources do not establish the origin site or demonstrate that first life used the same metabolism inferred for LUCA. Surface wet-dry cycling, UV-driven chemistry, and other proposals remain live. The literature supports chemical disequilibrium as an important constraint, not an exact confirmation of a specific origin narrative.

*The RNA world.* The empirical literature also bears on the problem of heritable specification. RNA can both carry sequence information and catalyze reactions, making RNA-world scenarios an important hypothesis. This does not yet constitute an empirical answer for the first heritable subsystem on Earth: the pathway from prebiotic chemistry to sustained RNA replication and integrated protocells remains unresolved. Cech -(Cech, T. R., A. J. Zaug, and P. J. Grabowski, 1981) and Guerrier-Takada et al. -(Guerrier-Takada, C., K. Gardiner, T. Marsh, N. Pace, and S. Altman, 1983) independently demonstrated that RNA can catalyze chemical reactions (the ribozyme discovery, awarded the Nobel Prize in 1989), establishing the catalysis half of the duality. The ribosome (the molecular machine that synthesizes proteins) is itself an RNA machine: the peptidyl transferase center that catalyzes peptide bond formation is a ribozyme (Nissen, P., J. Hansen, N. Ban, P. B. Moore, and T. A. Steitz, 2000), so the entire protein-synthesis infrastructure ultimately reduces to RNA catalysis. Lincoln and Joyce -(Lincoln, T. A., and G. F. Joyce, 2009) demonstrated cross-replicating ribozymes in laboratory conditions, showing RNA-only self-replication is achievable. Sutherland's group (Matthew W. Powner, Béatrice Gerland, John D. Sutherland, 2009); (Patel, B. H., C. Percivalle, D. J. Ritson, C. D. Duffy, and J. D. Sutherland, 2015) has shown that nucleotides, amino acids, and lipid precursors can all be synthesized from a common pool of simple feedstock molecules (HCN, cyanamide, hydrogen sulfide, UV), providing the prebiotic chemistry that bridges geochemistry to RNA. The convergence is exact at the level this account predicts: the first heritable medium combined catalysis with template-readability, and on Earth that medium was RNA before the catalytic role specialized into proteins and the template role specialized into DNA.

*Lab-confirmed prebiotic and protocell chemistry.* The component reactions of the chemoautotrophic-origin and RNA-world pictures are increasingly demonstrable in the laboratory. Becker et al. -(Becker, S., J. Feldmann, S. Wiedemann, H. Okamura, C. Schneider, K. Iwan, A. Crisp, M. Rossa, T. Amatov, and T. Carell, 2019) extended the Sutherland synthesis to a unified prebiotic pathway producing all four canonical RNA nucleotides (purines and pyrimidines) from a common feedstock. Muchowska, Varma, and Moran -(Muchowska, K. B., S. J. Varma, E. Chevallot-Beroux, L. Lethuillier-Karl, G. Li, and J. Moran, 2017); -(Muchowska, K. B., S. J. Varma, and J. Moran, 2019) demonstrated non-enzymatic versions of the reverse Krebs cycle catalyzed by Fe⁰ and other transition metals, supplying the non-enzymatic protometabolic chemistry this account requires. Herschy et al. -(Herschy, B., A. Whicher, E. Camprubí, C. Watson, L. Dartnell, J. Ward, J. R. G. Evans, and N. Lane, 2014) and Hudson et al. -(Hudson, R., R. de Graaf, M. Strandoo Rodin, A. Ohno, N. Lane, S. E. McGlynn, Y. M. A. Yamada, R. Nakamura, L. M. Barge, D. Braun, and V. Sojo, 2020) demonstrated CO₂ reduction to organic molecules in bench-scale alkaline-vent reactors driven by natural pH gradients across thin mineral barriers, instantiating the chemiosmotic-origin hypothesis at laboratory scale. On the protocell side, Adamala and Szostak -(Adamala, K., and J. W. Szostak, 2013) demonstrated non-enzymatic RNA template copying inside fatty-acid vesicles, and Wochner et al. -(Wochner, A., J. Attwater, A. Coulson, and P. Holliger, 2011) and Horning and Joyce -(Horning, D. P., and G. F. Joyce, 2016) extended the Lincoln–Joyce work toward general RNA-catalyzed RNA polymerization. The component steps of the structural picture are reproducibly demonstrable; the integrated demonstration (running geochemistry, protometabolism, polymerization, compartmentalization, and replication together in a single sustained system) is the open empirical frontier.

*The metabolism-first / replicator-first debate.* Origin-of-life research remains divided among metabolism-first (Wächtershäuser, G., 1988); (Martin, W., and M. J. Russell, 2003); (Lane, N., 2015), replicator-first (Eigen, M., 1971); (Joyce, G. F., 2002), and hybrid or co-emergence approaches. Gánti's chemoton ([§7.8.2](<7.8.2 What is Required.md>)) offers a useful model in which metabolic, boundary, and informational cycles are coupled, but it does not make the historical sequencing question malformed. The book's model favors integrated closure as the target that an origin account must eventually explain; it does not establish that all three cycles began simultaneously or that existing research programs have converged on co-emergence (Damer, B., and D. Deamer, 2020); (Smith, E., and H. J. Morowitz, 2016).

*The early-emergence puzzle abductively favors the necessity reading.* Earth became habitable around 4.4 billion years ago, after the Theia impact and the formation of liquid oceans. The earliest accepted biosignatures appear at 3.7 to 3.5 billion years ago (stromatolites; carbon isotopic signatures), with contested earlier evidence from Hadean zircons (Mojzsis, S. J., G. Arrhenius, K. D. McKeegan, T. M. Harrison, A. P. Nutman, and C. R. L. Friend, 1996); (Bell, E. A., P. Boehnke, T. M. Harrison, and W. L. Mao, 2015). The window from habitability to life is therefore on the order of 100 to 700 million years, geologically rapid. If life were a vanishingly improbable accident, the expectation would be either a long delay before emergence or near-immediate emergence followed by no further events. Instead, life appears about as soon as conditions permit and immediately begins elaborating the cycles it had to elaborate. This is what this account predicts: given sustained gradient conditions, life is the favored attractor, and the attractor is reached on whatever timescale the chemistry permits. The Earth datum supplies abductive support for the favoring reading: life arrives about as soon as conditions permit, which is more probable on this account than on contingent-accident accounts of origin.

This inference carries a known confound, and it should not be leaned on harder than it can bear. Because complex observers can only find themselves on a timeline where abiogenesis occurred early enough to leave time for observers to evolve before their star's main-sequence window closed, an observation-selection effect, Carter's anthropic argument -(Carter, B., 1983), predicts an early-looking origin *even if* abiogenesis were rare, so a single datum cannot cleanly separate 'fast because favored' from 'fast because we could not have observed it otherwise.' Bayesian analyses of the lone Earth datum bear this out: Kipping's re-analysis -(Kipping, D., 2020) finds that early emergence yields only a modest update toward rapid abiogenesis once the selection effect is folded in. The Earth timing is therefore consistent with the favoring reading and weakly confirmatory of it, not decisive; the abductive weight here is real but slight.

*Evolutionary theory.* A second, independent line arrives through the evolutionary theory of cognitive architecture and the theory of major transitions. At lower levels of organismic complexity, direct stimulus–response is sufficient for persistence. A plant orienting toward light, or a chemotactic bacterium following a gradient, maintains itself through relatively local coupling between sensor and effector. The coupling already involves the system tracking its own state, the bacterium's tumble-and-run is, in form, a registration of its own gradient position, but the recursive depth is shallow.

This strategy has well-documented limits. As a system's causal reach expands (as temporal horizons lengthen, relational complexity increases, and the fitness costs of prediction error grow) the information required to produce persistence-supporting behavior exceeds what shallow self-tracking can deliver. Selection pressure favors configurations that track not only current inputs but probable future states, and not only external conditions but the system's own position within them (Godfrey-Smith, P., 1996); (Sterelny, K., 2003), and beyond that, configurations that track themselves doing the tracking. Recursive elaboration of self-modeling is not an ornamental add-on to complexity; it is the next stable solution to the persistence problem once shallower self-tracking saturates. The empirical literature on the scaling of cognitive architecture, from bacterial cognition (Lyon, P., 2015) through unlimited associative learning (Ginsburg, S., and E. Jablonka, 2019) to integrated neural processing in cephalopods and mammals (Godfrey-Smith, P., 2016), is consistent with the constitutive claim that what increases is the recursive depth of the recursion.

*Where the tracking is housed.* Deepening individual self-modeling is one solution to the persistence problem, not the only one, and the alternative is instructive about what the first one costs. A lineage facing variable conditions can invest in an apparatus that models those conditions, or it can forgo the apparatus and distribute the coverage across its own variation, generating phenotypes stochastically at population sizes and generation rates that leave some fraction of them apt whatever the conditions turn out to be (Kussell, E., and S. Leibler, 2005). Bacterial persistence, sporulation, and phase variation are the canonical instances of the second strategy (Balaban, N. Q., J. Merrin, R. Chait, L. Kowalik, and S. Leibler, 2004); (Veening, J.-W., W. K. Smits, and O. P. Kuipers, 2008), and clonal selection in the vertebrate immune system runs it inside an organism rather than across one. Which strategy a lineage runs is an economic matter rather than a matter of organism size: modeling pays where cues are reliable and the apparatus is cheap relative to the fitness variance it averts, and randomizing pays where cues are poor or the apparatus is dear. Donaldson-Matasci, Bergstrom, and Lachmann -(Donaldson-Matasci, M. C., C. T. Bergstrom, and M. Lachmann, 2010) make the trade-off quantitative, showing that the fitness value of a developmental cue equals the reduction in uncertainty about the environment it supplies. This does not soften the claim that recursive self-modeling is the next stable solution once shallow self-tracking saturates; it specifies the conditions under which that solution is the one selection reaches, and it isolates what the apparatus buys. Distributed coverage is retrospective, registering only what has already selected, and it fails outright when conditions move outside the range its variation spans. An interior model is prospective, holding conditions that have not yet obtained. The saturation argument therefore applies where anticipation earns its keep, at lengthening horizons and rising costs of prediction error, and not wherever variation is merely cheap.

The major evolutionary transitions framework (Maynard Smith, J., and E. Szathmáry, 1995) names the discrete steps in this scaling: replicating molecules to cells, prokaryotes to eukaryotes, single cells to multicellularity, asexual to sexual reproduction, individuals to colonies, primate sociality to language. Each transition is a system-level reorganization in which the unit of selection nests inside a larger unit, and the larger unit's recursion runs deeper than its parts could individually. Niche construction theory (Odling-Smee, F. J., K. N. Laland, and M. W. Feldman, 2003) names the reciprocal-causation feedback by which organisms modify each other's selection environments, deepening the biosphere's internal complexity over time.

*Independent reachability of major transitions.* Several of the major transitions Maynard Smith and Szathmáry name have been reached independently many times across the tree of life, and some have been reproduced under laboratory selection. Multicellularity has originated independently at least twenty-five times, once in animals, multiple times in green algae, independently in red algae, brown algae, and fungi, in several bacterial lineages (filamentous cyanobacteria, myxobacteria, actinomycetes), and in the slime molds, supplying convergent evidence that the unicell-to-multicell transition is reproducibly reachable from substantially different starting points (Grosberg, R. K., and R. R. Strathmann, 2007); (Bonner, J. T., 1998). Ratcliff et al. -(Ratcliff, W. C., R. F. Denison, M. Borrello, and M. Travisano, 2012) evolved multicellularity *de novo* in *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* in approximately sixty generations of selection for fast settling, the "snowflake yeast" demonstration, and Boraas, Seale, and Boxhorn -(Boraas, M. E., D. B. Seale, and J. E. Boxhorn, 1998), with later replication by Herron et al. -(Herron, M. D., J. M. Borin, J. C. Boswell, J. Walker, I.-C. K. Chen, C. A. Knox, M. Boyd, F. Rosenzweig, and W. C. Ratcliff, 2019), evolved multicellular *Chlorella* colonies under flagellate-predation pressure. Eukaryogenesis, by contrast, appears to have occurred once on Earth (Lane, N., 2015), but the syntrophy hypothesis of its mechanism is being filled in by Imachi et al. -(Imachi, H., M. K. Nobu, N. Nakahara, Y. Morono, M. Ogawara, Y. Takaki, Y. Takano, K. Uematsu, T. Ikuta, M. Ito, et al., 2020), whose first laboratory cultivation of an Asgard archaeon (*Prometheoarchaeum syntrophicum*) showed obligate metabolic exchange with bacterial partners (the kind of intimate chemical association the eukaryogenesis hypothesis requires) building on the genomic bridging work of Spang et al. -(Spang, A., J. H. Saw, S. L. Jørgensen, K. Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, J. Martijn, A. E. Lind, R. van Eijk, C. Schleper, L. Guy, and T. J. G. Ettema, 2015). The pattern is consistent with this account: under sustained selective pressure, the major transitions are reproducibly reachable from independent starting points; transitions whose conditions persist across many lineages are reached many times.

Coevolutionary dynamics complete the picture at the relational level. Predator/prey arms races, host/parasite arms races, signaler/receiver arms races: each is a pairing in which selection on one population creates selection pressure on another, and the ecosystem's internal information processing thickens as the arms races elaborate. The social intelligence hypothesis (Humphrey, N. K., 1976) and the Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis (Byrne, R. W., and A. Whiten, eds., 1988) name the empirical pattern at the cognitive end of the same dynamic: primate cognition evolved primarily under social complexity rather than environmental complexity, because the hardest thing in a primate's environment is other primates. Theory of mind requires other minds to bear it on; modeling another mind that is modeling you requires depth of recursion no isolated lineage could produce on its own.

Evolutionary theory arrives, on its own terms, at the conclusion thermodynamics points toward: under sustained energy gradients, recursive self-modeling deepens, the biosphere reorganizes through discrete major transitions, and the directional pressure runs at the ecosystem level rather than at any single lineage.


---

← [7.8.3 What is Predicted](<7.8.3 What is Predicted.md>) | [7.8.5 What is Concluded](<7.8.5 What is Concluded.md>) →
