Symbols
The notation used throughout the argument, collected for reference. Each symbol is defined in full where it is introduced; the italic tag at the end of an entry points to the section where it first appears.
The Conditions
T · Temporality · The Condition of Reality such that succession is necessarily possible. First use: §1.4.
S · Spatiality · The Condition of Reality such that distinction is necessarily possible. First use: §1.4.
Φ · Physicality · The Condition of Reality such that exchange is necessarily possible. First use: §1.4.
T(x), S(x), Φ(x) · Predicate form · Applied to an individual x, each says that x instantiates the corresponding Condition.
Exists(x) · Existence predicate · Exists(x) =df T(x) ∧ S(x) ∧ Φ(x). To exist is to instantiate all three Conditions. First use: §1.5.
Structural terms
C · Change · Schematic letter for the change-event. First use: §1.3.
N · Nature · N =df T ∧ S ∧ Φ. The definition is box-free; the necessity □(T ∧ S ∧ Φ) is the earned result Triconditional Necessity (§2.5). First use: §1.4.4.
R · Reality · The totality of what is real, identified with Nature in □(R = N). First use: §1.1.
∅ · Null State · Absolute nothingness. First use: §2.7.1.
G · Classical God · The Maximally Great Being, defined by negation of the structural roles: ¬T, ¬S, ¬Φ. Subject of the modal-ontological arguments ◇□G and ◇□¬G. First use: §6.1.
Logical notation
□ · Necessity operator · □P is true just when P holds across every configuration of Reality. First use: §1.2.
◇ · Possibility operator · ◇P is true just when P holds in at least one configuration of Reality. First use: §1.2.
∧ ∨ ¬ → ↔︎ · Logical connectives · Conjunction, disjunction, negation, material conditional, biconditional.
∀ ∃ · Quantifiers · ∀ is the universal quantifier, read for all; ∃ is the existential quantifier, read there exists.
∴ · Therefore · Reserved for the conclusion lines of formal syllogisms.
=df · Defined as · Introduces a stipulative definition.
Variables
P, Q · Propositional variables · Schematic propositional variables, ranging over contentful claims. First use: §1.2.
w, w′, w₀, w₁, w₂, w∗ · Possible-world variables · w is the generic world; w′ the counterworld of the §2.1.5 negation reductio; w₀ the candidate world posited to lack the structural Conditions at §2.7.4; w₁, w₂, … enumerated worlds; w∗ the dual world introduced under bilateral symmetry at §6.1 and Appendix B item 16. First use: §2.1.5.